All Case Studies
Launched2025-01-22
ClientFlowstep
Duration8 weeks
IndustrySaaS / Workflow Automation
Services
Product StrategyUI/UX DesignFull-stack DevelopmentCloud InfrastructureQA & Launch
Currently bookingWant one like this?

Tell us what you're building. We'll come back with a plan.

Contact Us
SaaS / Workflow Automation

Flowstep — workflow automation platform

Project snapshot
8 weeks
Build duration
31
ACTIVE PIPELINES AT LAUNCH
2,847
RUNS EXECUTED IN FIRST MONTH
2.1s
AVERAGE PIPELINE RUN DURATION
Case study hero 1

Overview

Flowstep is a workflow automation platform that lets teams connect their favourite tools — Jira, Slack, Mailchimp, Intercom, and dozens more — into programmable pipelines that run on autopilot. Instead of switching between tabs and copying data by hand, users wire up triggers, steps, and connectors in a visual builder, then let the system handle the rest.

The founding team approached LevelByte with a working proof-of-concept built on internal scripts and spreadsheets. They needed a production-grade platform that could manage 30+ active pipelines, process thousands of webhook events per day, and give operators real-time visibility into every run — all behind a clean, intuitive dashboard.

Over eight weeks we took Flowstep from prototype to production: data modelling, UX design, frontend and backend development, connector integrations, and deployment on edge-optimised infrastructure — delivering a platform that launched with 31 active pipelines and 99.2% uptime from day one.

The Challenge

Before working with LevelByte, the Flowstep team had validated demand through a pilot programme with a handful of early adopters. But moving beyond hand-wired scripts to a reliable, multi-tenant product exposed several critical gaps that were blocking growth.

Pain · 01

Fragile integrations

Each connector (Jira, Stripe, Google Drive, etc.) was a bespoke script with no shared contract, error handling, or refresh logic — meaning one API change could silently break half the customer’s pipelines.

Pain · 02

Zero observability

There was no centralised log of pipeline runs, step-level pass/fail status, or webhook payloads — making debugging a manual, time-consuming process for every support ticket.

Pain · 03

No visual builder

Users had to define automations in JSON config files. The team needed an intuitive setup flow with triggers, data-source linking, request configuration, and step sequencing to unlock self-serve onboarding.

Pain · 04

Scaling bottleneck

The single-threaded execution engine couldn’t handle concurrent pipeline runs, and lacked retry logic, backoff, or dead-letter queuing — critical requirements for any automation tool processing real production traffic.

Build a scalable, real-time automation platform in 8 weeks — complete with a visual pipeline builder, 10+ third-party connectors, and an observability layer that gives operators instant visibility into every run.

Project Timeline

Phase 01Requirements
01

Stakeholder + operator interviews, audit of 10 connector APIs (Jira, Slack, Mailchimp, Intercom, etc.), and the full pipeline lifecycle mapped against the 9 real automations early adopters were already running.

Phase 02Planning
02

Sprint plan, the shared connector contract (so future integrations slot in without rewriting the engine), the Redis-backed job-queue topology, and continuous-deployment cadence with weekly demos.

Phase 03UI/UX Design
03

Wireframes for all 7 key screens (dashboard, pipeline list, visual builder, run logs, webhook viewer, connector hub, settings) with a non-technical operator in mind — no raw JSON, no jargon, just a clear linear flow.

Phase 04Full-Stack Development
04

The product itself: pipeline engine with retry + backoff, webhook ingestion, 10 connector integrations, the visual setup builder (trigger → filter → action), the run-log viewer with payload drill-down, and the connector hub with credential rotation.

Phase 05Testing
05

Load tested with 2,800+ simulated pipeline runs, connector failover and retry scenarios, webhook payload fuzzing, credential-rotation drills, and a full RBAC + RLS security review before promotion.

Phase 06Deployment & Maintenance
06

Production deploy on Vercel’s edge network with Redis-backed job queues, Sentry monitoring, real-time alerting on pipeline failures, and the 7-day post-launch bug warranty window.

Key Features Delivered

Flowstep · feature board4shipped · click to preview

Technology Stack

Each layer chosen for the way it serves the product \u2014 not the trend cycle.

Layer 01

Frontend

Next.js on Vercel’s edge — the dashboard, builder canvas, and run-log viewer paint sub-second from any region, which matters when operators are debugging a live failure.

Next.jsTypeScriptTailwindVercel
Layer 02

Engine & ingestion

Webhook ingestion + Redis-backed job queues power the pipeline engine. Retries, backoff, and dead-letter queueing are first-class — not bolt-on.

WebhooksRedis
Layer 03

Data & realtime

Supabase covers Postgres, row-level security, and realtime subscriptions for live run status — one stack, no glue, fast queries on the run history table.

SupabasePostgreSQL
Layer 04

Ops & insight

Sentry-tracked errors per pipeline, run duration metrics, and credential-rotation alerts — so the team catches degradation before customers do.

Results & Impact

Eight weeks from internal scripts to a production automation platform — here is what landed in operator hands.

Headline result31ACTIVE PIPELINES AT LAUNCH
022,847RUNS EXECUTED IN FIRST MONTH
032.1sAVERAGE PIPELINE RUN DURATION
0499.2%UPTIME SINCE GO-LIVE

Design & Development Highlights

Wireframing & UX Strategy01 · HighlightUX
#wireframing#operator-first#real-pipelines

Wireframing & UX Strategy

We structured the product around four core workflows: monitoring (dashboard), creating (pipeline builder), debugging (log & webhook viewer), and managing (connector hub). Each flow was wireframed as a complete journey — from entry to completion — and validated against the 9 real pipeline types (Lead Routing, Churn Alert, Cart Recovery, etc.) that early adopters were already running. This ensured the UI wasn’t designed for hypothetical use cases but for actual operational patterns.

Takeaways
  • 4 core workflows mapped end-to-end: monitor, create, debug, manage
  • Validated against 9 real pipeline types from early adopters
  • No JSON in the operator flow — every config is a visual control
7Core screens wireframed
01/ 04

Final Thoughts

Flowstep demonstrates that a complex, integration-heavy automation platform can be designed, built, and shipped in eight weeks without cutting corners. From a visual pipeline builder to 10 third-party connectors to real-time webhook observability — every feature was delivered production-ready.

By combining Supabase’s real-time capabilities with Redis-backed job queues and Vercel’s edge deployment, we built an infrastructure that processed 2,847 pipeline runs in its first month with a 2.1-second average execution time and 99.2% uptime. The platform launched with 31 active pipelines across 9 automation categories and is already scaling to support the next cohort of customers.

This project is a case study in what’s possible when product thinking meets engineering discipline. No shortcuts, no throwaway code — just a clean, well-architected system designed to grow with the business.

From prototype to production in 8 weeks — 31 active pipelines, 10 connectors, real-time observability, and 99.2% uptime from day one.
Let's build some software

Let’s buildsomethingreal.

From 0 to production, we're the engineering partneryour team deserves.

LevelByte
( © 2026 LevelByte. All rights reserved. )
All Systems Operational